Legal Opinion

De Marco v. Braund

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1966PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

The single issue presented here, which is dispositive of the appeal, is: Is there any credible evidence to support the jury’s finding that the respondent was hot negligent with respect to furnishing or main- taming a place of employment for his employees and frequenters as safe as the nature of the place would reasonably permit?

Whether or not a place is safe within the meaning of the statute depends on the facts and circumstances of the particular case. And whether or not there has been compliance with the safe-place statute is generally a question for the jury. A jury verdict will not be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Zehren v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Powless v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Anderson v. Joint School District No. 3Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Heckel v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Cheetham v. Piggly Wiggly Madison Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dykstra v. Arthur G. McKee & Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  2. Fitzgerald v. Badger State Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Topp v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Gerdmann Ex Rel. Habush v. United States Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  5. Skybrock v. Concrete Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API