De Marco v. Braund
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
The single issue presented here, which is dispositive of the appeal, is: Is there any credible evidence to support the jury’s finding that the respondent was hot negligent with respect to furnishing or main- taming a place of employment for his employees and frequenters as safe as the nature of the place would reasonably permit?
Whether or not a place is safe within the meaning of the statute depends on the facts and circumstances of the particular case. And whether or not there has been compliance with the safe-place statute is generally a question for the jury. A jury verdict will not be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zehren v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Powless v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Anderson v. Joint School District No. 3Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Heckel v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Cheetham v. Piggly Wiggly Madison Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dykstra v. Arthur G. McKee & Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- Fitzgerald v. Badger State Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Topp v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Gerdmann Ex Rel. Habush v. United States Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Skybrock v. Concrete Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.