Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 21, 2002No. 02-40755PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Chief Judge:

Plaintiffs-Appellants Johnny Joe Martinez, Gary Etheridge, and Napoleon Beaz-ley challenge the district court’s judgment dismissing, for lack of jurisdiction, their complaint alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. Due to the exigencies of time, we construe this appeal alternatively as an application for permission to file a successive habeas corpus petition, which we DENY.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Johnny Joe Martinez, Gary Etheridge, and Napoleon Beaz-ley (collectively, “the Plaintiffs”) are all prisoners…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Edwards v. BalisokSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Bazrowx v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Richard William Kutzner v. Janie Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. Kutzner v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  3. Martinez v. the Texas Court of Criminal AppealsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  4. Kutzner v. CockrellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  5. Kutzner v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API