United States v. Burns
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JONES, Senior Judge:
Appellant comes before this Court convicted of possessing marihuana in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. As the case was tried prior to 2 July 1976, there is no impediment to charging and punishing the appellant under the general article. United States v. Jackson, 3 M.J. 101 (C.M.A.1977).
I
One of the errors assigned by the appellant is that the convening authority and staff judge advocate were disqualified to act on the record because of a prior agreement with two of the witnesses to testify in this case and to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. WardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. RobertsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. SimsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976