Douglas v. American Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Judge.
The amended motion for new trial refers to certain exhibits which do not appear in the record and are not properly identified by the trial judge. It is obvious that this court cannot consider the alleged error in the exclusion of documentary evidence when the evidence appears nowhere in the record. Where the errors complained of relate to and require a considera tion of evidence, it must be brought up in the bill of exceptions or attached to it as exhibits properly identified by the trial judge or embodied in an approved brief of evidence and brought up as a part of the record.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Martin v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Adkins v. FlaggSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Southern Railway Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Black & White Cab Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Spence v. DasherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mabry v. HenleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Wilson v. KornegayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- McDaniel v. GangarosaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Buffalo Cab Co. v. GurleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- McDaniel v. GangarosaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972