Legal Opinion

Kolyer v. Westmoreland Coal Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1942No. Appeal, 282PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

The referee, the Workmen’s Compensation Board, and the court below refused to allow claimant additional compensation. On behalf of claimant, who has appealed, the question involved is stated thus: Where, as the result of the loss of his foot, claimant is required to use crutches, and, within the period during which he is receiving compensation, his crutch slips, causing Mm to fall and injure himself seriously about the Mp ánd pelvic region, is the claimant entitled to compensation in addition to that for tbe loss of the foot?

Claimant, while employed by defendant, was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hornetz v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Marshall v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Gallagher v. Hudson Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McAvoy v. Roberts & Mander Stove Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Trumpikas v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Friel v. Sun Shipbuilding & Drydock Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Wengryn v. Superior Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. GMH Assocs. Inc. v. Prudential Realty Group, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API