Pack v. Progressive Life Insurance

This is an action on two identical life insurance policies, each insuring the life of O. E. Pack in the sum of $1000. Plaintiff, the wife of insured, was named beneficiary. There was a judgment for plaintiff in the aggregate sum of $2338.84, from which defendant appeals.

It is insisted that the appeal should be dismissed for the reason the statement contained in appellant’s brief does not comply with our rules.

The statement is longer than necessary and gives more prominence to the correspondence had between the parties than to the evidence of the plaintiff. However, the evidence of plaintiff…