Legal Opinion

Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Jamieson

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided January 14, 1982No. C-79-2464PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT; CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER

HORTON, District Judge.

This is an indemnity lawsuit by Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company (Fireman’s Fund) against A. S. Jamieson and F. R. Fisher, III, individually, and Jamieson & Fisher, Inc., (Jamieson & Fisher) agents and agency of plaintiff, seeking a judgment for $165,000. The lawsuit is based upon theories of breach of contract, breach of the duties and obligations of the agency relationship and negligence.

The following facts are essentially undisputed:

1) Plaintiff issued its policy of insurance, # MXP2756668 covering 63 building locations,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company, Mansfield, Ohio v. Robert Bowman and Walter Lewis and W. A. Thornberry, D/B/A Pete Thornberry & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  2. Hood v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1976
  3. Hays v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  4. Virginia Surety Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
  5. United Pacific Insurance v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southeastern Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API