Wright v. Redd Bros.

This is an appeal in error by J. F. Wright, the unsuccessful defendant, in an action of replevin for the possession of two mules.

The substance of the only assignment of error is that there is no evidence to support the verdict, in that undisputed testimony shows that the mules involved were under mortgage to a third person, and, consequently^ not subject to the pos-sessory action of' the plaintiffs, Bedd Bros.

This objection calls for an. investigation of the proof in the ’case, which, ' for 'the lack- of ' a proper bill of exceptions, is not before us. • The transcript contains what was…