Legal Opinion

Connelly v. Beauchamp

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 28, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

The appellees brought suit in the Pulaski Circuit Court, alleging that they had entered into a contract with appellant Connelly to construct certain improvements in said district; that said contract provided for the appellant laying a sheet asphalt surface on certain streets, and provided for him to give a maintenance bond, guaranteeing said work. Connelly completed the improvement on the 13th day of June, 1924, and on the 27th day of June, 1924, gave a maintenance bond which mentioned the construction contract, and provided for keeping the street in repair for a period of five years, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hot Springs Ry. Co. v. MaherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  2. English v. ShelbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  3. District of Columbia v. ClephaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Hayes Grain & Commission Co. v. Federal Grain Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  5. Blytheville Courier v. McCallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McCaleb v. National Bank of Commerce of Pine BluffCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Rodgers v. LyonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  3. Barnett v. Mountain View School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  4. Lindon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1958
  5. Ramsay v. RobertsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API