Legal Opinion
Trombley v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 22, 1987No. Civ. A. 87-71592PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FEIKENS, District Judge.
David Trombley and James Concord (“plaintiffs”), former bargaining unit employees of Ford Motor Company (“defendant”), filed suit in Wayne County Circuit Court and claimed defendant wrongfully discharged them in retaliation for their worker’s compensation claims, Suchodolski v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co., 412 Mich. 692 (1982), and in violation of the Michigan Handicappers’ Civil Rights Act, Mich.Comp.Laws §§ 37.1101-37.1607. Defendant removed the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441, claiming it presented a federal cause of action for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Daryl A. Miller v. At & T Network Systems, an at & T Technologies, Inc. Group, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Gavie v. Stroh Brewery Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
- Sargent v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, & Helpers of America, Food & Beverage Drivers, WarehousemenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1989
- Sargent v. INTERN. BROTH. OF TEAMSTERSDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.