Legal Opinion

State v. Wientjes

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 25, 1991No. 22960-KAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant, David F. Wientjes, was charged with possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, a violation of LSA-R.S. 40:966A(1). The defendant entered a plea of nolo contendere and was sentenced to seven years at hard labor. On appeal, the defendant asserts two assignments of error. Defendant argues that his plea is invalid as the trial court did not inform him that, as a third felony offender, he was ineligible for probation or parole. He also argues that the seven-year hard labor sentence is excessive. Finding neither of the assignments of error to have merit, we affirm.

On October…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State Ex Rel. Jackson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  3. State v. NuccioSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. LaFleur v. DonnellySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  5. State v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. FrithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2000
  3. State v. RobinsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. State v. WientjesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API