Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Brophy v. District Court

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1934No. 7,275PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

In May, 1932, Chauncey L. Berrien died testate. His wife, Celia Berrien, was sole devisee and legatee under the will. She was appointed and served as executrix until her death in April, 1933. Mary Gavigan was thereafter appointed administratrix of the estate. Celia Berrien left a will in which relator Murry Brophy was named as sole beneficiary and executor. On July 8, 1933, the court on petition of Mary Gavigan, and after due notice thereof by posting as provided by sections 10299, 10300, and 10330, Revised Codes 1921, entered a decree of final settlement of her account and distribution of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tremont Trust Co. v. BurackMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Greene v. Montana Brewing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. EarnestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. State ex rel. Zosel v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  5. State Ex Rel. Brophy v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Regis v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State Ex Rel. Clark v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API