Brown v. Kingsley
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Delaware Circuit Court. Action eor Seduction. Jury trial. Yerdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant «appeals. Tlie further facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, On. J.
— I. The first assigned error is in overruling appellant’s motion for a more specific statement of the “ acts made use of to deceive and mislead,” and to require the plaintiff “ to aver that they were believed by her, or relied on as true, genuine, or real, and that she acted on them as such.”
*221, seduction. The fact of seduction was sufficiently alleged in the petition. It was the ultimate fact to be established by proof' of acts on the part of the defendant led to the seduction. This ultimate fact only was proper to be stated in the pleading. The evidence tending to establish it…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. MilburnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- State v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Way v. Illinois Central R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1872
3Cited by17 opinions
- French v. DeaneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
- Nevins v. NevinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Carter v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Marshall v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Shewalter v. BergmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.