Legal Opinion

Tyk v. Surat

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 12, 2017No. 15-3813-cvUnpublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Appellant Aaron Tyk, a lawyer appearing pro se, appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Appellees Eric Surat and the City of New York. Tyk sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for malicious prosecution, selective enforcement in violation of the Equal Protection clause, and excessive force. He also brought state law claims. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.

We review de novo a district court’s grant of summary judgment, with the view that summary judgment is appropriate only “if…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Leeke v. TimmermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Segal v. City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Booker v. GriffinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
  2. DeLaney v. PerezDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
  3. DiDonna v. MassDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  4. Geller v. CuomoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  5. Geller v. CuomoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API