Legal Opinion

Alameda Water & Sanitation District v. Browner

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 9, 1993No. 93-1032PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Chief Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Appellants, various environmental groups interested in preventing the construction of Two Forks Dam outside of Denver and hereafter referred to as the Caucus, appeal the district court’s denial of their motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(a)(2) to intervene as of right in a suit brought by various Denver…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Boston & Maine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. Perry County Board of Education, Joann Parsons, Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Cruz CorralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. Allen Calculators, Inc. v. National Cash Register Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. San Juan County, Utah v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Wildearth Guardians v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA CORP. v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  4. State ex rel. Oklahoma Corp. Commission v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  5. Bank of Commerce v. Breakers, L.L.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API