Legal Opinion
Gonzalez v. City of Santa Monica
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 23, 2004No. 02-56553; D.C. No. CV-99-05409-RPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This court’s memorandum disposition filed December 15, 2003 is withdrawn and replaced with the attached disposition.
With the filing of this new disposition, appellant’s petition for rehearing, filed December 29, 2003, is hereby DENIED.
MEMORANDUM **
Petitioner Arturo Gonzalez appeals the grant of summary judgment and dismissal of his § 1983 action for use of excessive force, for arrest without probable cause, and for malicious prosecution. Because the complaint and supporting evidence, when construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, properly allege a constitutional violation,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Santos v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Andres M. Martinez v. G.D. Stanford W. Owen M. Atkinson D. Rockholt J. StovallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.