Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Haas v. Stone

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 27, 1941No. 1 Div. 136PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The petition was for mandamus to compel payment of salary of an official alleged to be due. There was a judgment sustaining demxxrrer and dismissing the petition and the taxing of petitioner.with the costs.

The grounds of demurrer are to the effect that there was no law irx force which made it the duty of appellee, as Treasurer of Mobile County, to honor the warrant in this suit.

The decision of this, case depends on the answer to the question of whether Section XXIV of the General Acts of 1939, Acts 1939, pp. 178-189, which was approved March 15, 1939, and which reads as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. State ex rel. EnslenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. State ex rel. Winter v. SayreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  3. Lacey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Byrd v. State Ex Rel. ColquettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. State ex rel. Robertson v. McGoughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Wright v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Cooper v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Johnson v. YeildingDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1958
  5. State on Inf. Murphy v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API