Stogner v. Richeson
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAY, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this appeal, Appellant Larry Stogner, as independent executor of the estate of N.E. Stogner, challenges the jury’s verdict that a contested certificate of deposit was a non-probate asset. In nine issues, Stog-ner argues that the evidence was legally and factually insufficient to support the trial court’s judgment. Because we find that the evidence was sufficient, we affirm.
II. BACKGROUND
N.E. Stogner established a certificate of deposit (CD) at First National Bank in Granbury, Texas, titled “IN TRUST FOR BETTIE RICHESON,” his sister. However, N.E. did not…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Victoria Bank & Trust Co. v. BradyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.