Legal Opinion

Laughton v. Harden

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 27, 1878PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On demurrer to a bill in equity.

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

The bill alleges that Eben Harden, owning certain parcels of land, conveyed them to his son, Cushman E. Harden, to defraud his creditors ; that the complainant obtained an execution against the grantor, and levied it upon a portion of the land so conveyed; and the complainant prays that the title to the land levied upon shall be released to him by the grantee. The bill is met by a general demurrer.

The first point taken on the demurrer is, that Eben Harden, the grantor, should have been made a defendant to the bill. He is no party to it. This objection must be overruled. Eben *209Harden no longer…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sexton v. WheatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Sears v. HardyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. Savage v. . MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  4. Lawrence v. . Bank of the RepublicNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  5. Carpenter v. . RoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1851

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Snyder v. FreeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. Wilson v. SpearSupreme Court of Vermont · 1894
  3. Boyle v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1928
  4. Preston v. CutterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1887
  5. McKenna v. CrowleySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API