Legal Opinion · Dissent

Vives v. Fortier

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 5, 1967No. 2625Published

1DissentYarrut, Judge

While I concur in most of the conclusions of the majority, I must dissent from that part which holds that the husband should not reimburse his wife for half of the mortgage debt paid by her to the building and loan association following her purchase of the property at the public sale instituted by the federal government to collect federal income taxes.

The contention of the husband' that his divorced wife did not acquire the home as her separate property is not tenable. He cites Miller v. Vivian Oil Co., 131 La. 761, 60 So. 236, for the proposition that, when a co-owner buys property at a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pons v. Yazoo & M. V. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  2. Hilgenfeld v. HilgenfeldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Miller v. Vivian Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API