Siekmann v. Schwartz
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Porter Parker, Judge. Action by Dr. Ivan Siekmann against Mrs. Widow Henrietta Schwartz. Defendant obtained an injunction on the ground that the note and mortgage sued on were forgeries, and plaintiff! appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, C. J.
This is the second appeal in the case. The parties are the same and the cause of action. See Siekmann v. Schwartz, 128 La. 10, 54 South. 405.
In the first action the ease was remanded to enable the parties to litigate the question of forgery vel non not directly passed upon in the district court in the first suit.. In deciding the issues on the first appeal above cited, it became necessary to deterihine whether or not an admission of the defendant when the note in controversy was presented to her was binding or not.
[1] The facts in regard to this acknowledgment of Mrs. Schwartz are that, when…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Plicque v. LabrancheSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1836
- Succession of Randazzo v. FerrantelliSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
- Siekmann v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schwartz v. SiekmannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
- &198tna Finance Co. v. BetzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
- Barron v. Jackson Parish BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936