Legal Opinion

Tera XTal Tech v. GT Adv Tech.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided February 13, 2017No. 16-cv-91-PBPublished

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Tera Xtal Technology Corp. v. Civil No. 16-cv-91-PB Opinion No.

2017 DNH 024

GT Advanced Technologies, Inc., et al. OPINION GT Advanced Technologies Limited (“GTAT”) and affiliated entities are the debtors-in-possession (the “Debtors”) in a jointly administered Chapter 11 proceeding before the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Hampshire. Tera Xtal Technology Corp. (“TXT”), a creditor in the case, filed an administrative expense claim that it argued was entitled to priority pursuant to § 503 of the Bankruptcy…

2Cases cited15 opinions

Reading Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
Calvi v. Knox CountyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
Tropigas De Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Certain UnderwritersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
Heard v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
Brandt v. Repco Printers & Lithographics, Inc. (In Re Healthco International, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.