Legal Opinion

Turner v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 24, 1984No. 79, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The principal question in this case is whether Maryland Code (1957, 1982 Repl.Vol.), Art. 27, §§ 152 and 153 (Female Sitters Law), which makes it unlawful to employ female sitters, is a violation of the Maryland Declaration of Rights, Art. 46, the Maryland Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). A second question concerns whether an employer of female sitters has standing to raise this question.

Article 46 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights provides:

“Equality of rights under the law shall not be abridged or denied because of sex.”

Article 27, § 152 provides:

“It shall be unlawful for…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Turner v. DammonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  3. Conaway v. DeaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. State v. Burning Tree Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Sugarloaf Citizens Assoc., Inc. v. GudisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API