Legal Opinion
225 Front Street, Ltd. v. City of Binghamton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 9, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.
Proceeding initiated in this Court pursuant to EDPL 207 to review a determination of respondent which found that there was a public benefit to be served by the proposed condemnation of a portion of petitioner’s property.
In April 2006, respondent—through its retained consultants— completed a final design report for the “Front Street Reconstruction Project,” which proposed changes to Front Street in the City of Binghamton, Broome County and its intersection with Clinton Street, to “improve traffic mobility for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists and improve truck access to Bingham*1156ton’s First…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Waldo's, Inc. v. Village of Johnson CityNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Aspen Creek Estates, Ltd. v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- MATTER OF ASPEN CREEK ESTATES, LTD. v. Town of BrookhavenNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Greenwich Associates v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Board of Cooperative Educational Services v. Town of ColonieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of Hart v. Town of Guilderland Indus. Dev. AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- Matter of Johnson v. Town of CarogaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Matter of PSC, LLC v. City of Albany Indus. Dev. AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021