Legal Opinion

Worthy v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 8, 1999No. A99A0476PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Ulysses Worthy appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, of armed robbery and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Worthy contends that the trial court erred (1) by failing to grant a mistrial after the prosecutor made improper comments during opening statements; (2) by failing to charge on the lesser included offense of robbery; and (3) that the sentencing requirements of OCGA § 17-10-7 are unconstitutional. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm Worthy’s convictions.

1. During the State’s opening statement, the prosecutor said:

[T]hat is what we…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ranger v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Ortiz v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  4. Fleming v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Havron v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Herndon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. The State v. SpriggsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API