State v. Lucero
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
The issue we confront in this case is whether the metropolitan court six-month rule begins to run anew, as does the district court six-month rule, when a case is remanded following a successful state’s appeal. We hold that it does not.
To put the issue in proper factual perspective, we state the facts chronologically. The state filed its original complaint against defendant on February 6, 1990. On March 12, the metropolitan court scheduled defendant for trial on June 20. On March 16, defendant filed a notice of excusal of the metropolitan court judge. See SCRA 1986,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Burroughs v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS, CTY., BERNALILLONew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- Patterson v. Globe American Casualty Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. MendozaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. EdenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Levario v. Ysidro Villareal Labor AgencyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Walker v. WaltonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. MaestasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Gutierrez v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.