Legal Opinion

Tappis v. National Van Lines, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 22, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The service of the summons outside the County of Westchester was invalid and conferred no jurisdiction upon the City Court of New Rochelle (New Rochelle City Court Act, § 201; § 205, suhd, 1). Defendant was not in default in raising the jurisdictional question. Service is measured from time of mailing, not time of receipt. (OPDR 2103, suhd. [b], par. 2; Jackson & Perkins Co. v. The Rose Fair, 278 App. Div. 890.)

Furthermore there is no time limit for making an attack based on lack of personal jurisdiction of defendant. (7 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, p. 390.)

The order should be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jackson & Perkins Co. v. Rose Fair, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coyne v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Syracuse City Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API