Legal Opinion

Formicola v. Formicola

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 1971No. Docket 7389PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.

Plaintiff husband commenced an action for divorce on the ground of adultery. MOLA §552.6(1) (Stat Ann 1957 Rev §25.86[1]). Defendant wife answered and counterclaimed for divorce on the ground of cruelty. MOLA § 552.8 (Stat Ann 1957 Rev §25.88).

At the trial, evidence was introduced that defendant had left her husband and their children and moved into an apartment with another man. They signed the lease therefor as husband and wife. As a defense against such conduct, defendant offered testimony of plaintiff’s alleged refusal or inability to provide adequate finances to meet family needs.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wells v. WellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Weiss v. WeissMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Kessinger v. KessingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Dean v. DeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Arix v. ArixMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prus v. PrusMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. McKeone v. McKeoneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. McKeone v. McKeoneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API