Schwimmer v. Roth
New York Supreme Court
Action for specific performance.
1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.
The plaintiffs are assignees from the purchaser under a contract for the sale of real property made by the defendants. The defendants were unable to make title for the reason that the property was incumbered by mortgages which were not known to the defendants to exist. A mortgage which the defendants had held on the property was foreclosed and through the error of the title company its search failed to show that the mortgages in question were subject to the one being foreclosed. The attorney, relying upon the search, did not make the holders of these mortgages parties. After the defendants…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pumpelly v. . PhelpsNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Staats v. Executors of Ten EyckNew York Supreme Court · 1805
- Northridge v. . MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Peters v. McKeonNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- Jenks v. . QuinnNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.