Legal Opinion · Dissent

Eusebio Soloranzo Costilla v. State of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided August 14, 2002No. 09-01-00132-CRPublished

1DissentDon Burgess, Justice

I vigorously dissent to issues one. and two. I reluctantly concur with issues three and four. This case has several troubling issues. First, a few chronological events. The indictment was returned to the 410th District Court of the Honorable K Michael Mayes on August 22, 2000. In September, 2000, Judge Mayes, Costilla and attorney George Renneberg signed a scheduling order. On September 12, 2000, Renneberg filed a “Motion to Appoint Translator”1 alleging Costilla “speaks the Spanish language.” On September 26, 2000, Costilla filed a letter requesting to change lawyers. On January 12, 2001,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Reyes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Shields v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Mendez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API