Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Sharma v. Ramlal

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 2, 2011No. 2D10-5211Published

1ConcurrenceLaROSE, Judge

I fully concur that this case must be reversed and remanded for further proceedings in the trial court. Appellees failed to establish that no genuine issues of material fact remained. Consequently, the grant of summary judgment was unwarranted.

On a more fundamental matter, I question appellees’ standing to sue. See Wiccan Religious Coop. of Fla., Inc. v. Zin-gale, 898 So.2d 134, 135 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), review dismissed, 944 So.2d 233 (Fla.2006) (holding that taxpayer, a religious organization, lacked standing to bring challenge alleging unconstitutionality of sales tax exemption statute;…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Malicki v. DoeSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Mansfield v. PeakeSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Archdiocese of Miami, Inc. v. MinagorriDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  4. House of God v. WhiteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  5. WICCAN RELIGIOUS CO-OP. OF FLA. v. ZingaleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API