Legal Opinion

Zlotoecizski v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Saginaw; Wilber, J. Bill by Joseph Zlotoecizski and Tofila Zlotoecizski against Rawson Smith, Arthur H. Swarthout and wife, and Herman Brandt and wife, to set aside a foreclosure sale. From a decree for complainants, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Defendant Smith was in 1892 a resident of the State of New York. Mr. Swarthout was his agent at Saginaw in loaning money. June 17, 1892, during the absence of Mr. Swarthout from the State, Mr. Hudson was in charge of his office, and attended to his business. The complainants, who are from Poland, and are unable to read or write the English language, negotiated a loan from Mr. Hudson; and a mortgage was given upon a lot owned by them to Mr. Smith, for $130. There was paid to complainants at this time $118. The principal was *203payable, by the terms of the mortgage, in three years. The interest…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lee v. ClaryMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Reading v. WatermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Louder v. BurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Mabie v. HatingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oades v. Standard Sayings & Loan AssnMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Guardian Depositors Corp. v. KellerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Jaarda v. Van OmmenMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Deland v. JacobsteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API