Legal Opinion

Wicker v. Hotchkiss

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1871PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hou. John G. Rogers, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thornton

This was an action on the case for malicious prosecution. The gravamen is the procurement of an indictment for larceny, maliciously and without probable cause; and the consequence the arrest and imprisonment.

There must be proof of both malice and of want of probable cause, to render the party liable in this action.

If there was probable cause for procuring the indictment, there can be no liability upon the defendant; and if he communicated to counsel all the facts, bearing upon the guilt or innocence of the accused, of which he had knowledge, or' could by reasonable diligence have ascertained,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. William M. Ross & Co. v. InnisIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Ross v. InnisIllinois Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Holiday Magic, Inc. v. ScottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  2. Glenn v. LawrenceIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. El Reno Gas & Electric Co. v. SpurgeonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Shatz v. PaulAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  5. Cooper v. FlemmingTennessee Supreme Court · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API