Legal Opinion

Tatum v. Toledo Scale Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1939No. 5815PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

The sole question tendered by this appeal is whether the judgment defendant seeks to execute against plaintiff is invalid because of the alleged premature and “irregular” taking of preliminary default.

In the original suit wherein defendant sued plaintiff to recover a money judgment, prior to judgment by default, defendant therein (plaintiff here) filed a motion to require plaintiff to furnish bond for court costs. This motion is predicated upon Act No. Ill of 1926. It does not appear that the costs sought to be made secure by the bond were of that character which the Supreme…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. BonnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Whitson v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  3. Vignie v. BradySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  4. Union Bethel African Methodist Episcopal Church v. Civil SheriffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gerace v. BentleySuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
  2. Stassi v. FalgoutLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API