State ex rel. Festor v. Staed

DISSENTING OPINION.

Rombauer, P. J.

In the main action, out of which the present controversy arose, the court found that Anton Meglitsch had, in fraud of the plaintiffs and of his infant son George, all of whom were parties to the action, acquired title to the real estate on which he resided, and was holding it adversely to all his children. The court thereupon decreed that all right, title, and interest, in and to said real estate be divested out of him and vested in the plaintiffs and the defendant’s infant son, George, in equal proportions, and ordered a writ of possession to issue in favor…