Legal Opinion

(PC) Baker v. Lynch

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 8, 2024No. 2:19-cv-02617Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TIMOTHY RAY BAKER, No. 2:19-CV-2617-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 J. HOWARD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ unopposed motion to compel Plaintiff 19 to provide responses to written discovery and to attend his deposition. See ECF No. 66. 20 The purpose of discovery is to "remove surprise from trial preparation so the 21 parties can obtain evidence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. William Hunt v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Avila v. Willits Environmental Remediation TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States ex rel. O'Connell v. Chapman UniversityDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API