State v. Poder
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Mahaska District Court. — Hon. K. E. Wilcockson, Judge. The defendant was convicted of having entered into a conspiracy to do an illegal act injurious to public morals and appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
The specific charge made against the defendant is that he conspired with two other named persons with the unlawful purpose and intent to entice certain named young women from their homes, and from the persons having them in legal custody, for the purposes of prostitution and lewdness, and to cause said young women to become prostitutes, and commit adultery and fornication. The case was tried to a 'jury, and defendant found guilty as charged.
1. Criminal law: conspiracy: indictment: sufficiency. I. The appellant challenges the sufficiency of the indictment, in that it fails to charge an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. LightfootSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- State v. HathawaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- State v. LoserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- State v. CroffordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- State v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. TonnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Kinard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Kreiner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- Stassi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.