Legal Opinion

Dye v. Santander Consumer USA Inc. d/b/a Chrysler Capital

District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Decided January 23, 2024No. 1:23-cv-00045Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CLARKSBURG CASEY DYE, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-45 (KLEEH) SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC. d/b/a CHRYSLER CAPITAL, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT [ECFS NO. 12, 16] Pending before the Court is Defendant Santander Consumer USA Inc. d/b/a Chrysler Capital’s (“Chrysler Capital” or “Defendant”) Motion Pursuant to Federal Arbitration Act [ECF No. 12] and Supplement to Motion to Stay Pursuant to Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act [ECF No. 16]. For…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. International Paper Company v. Schwabedissen Maschinen & Anlagen GmbhCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  3. Chesapeake Appalachia v. Cecil L. HIckman, etc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Bluestem Brands, Inc. d/b/a Fingerhut v. Darlene ShadeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API