Legal Opinion

Stebbins v. Polano

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 30, 2021No. 4:21-cv-04184Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID A. STEBBINS, 7 Case No. 21-cv-04184-JSC Plaintiff, 8 v. SCREENING ORDER PURSUANT TO 9

28 U.S.C. § 1915

AND ORDER RE: KARL POLANO, MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL 10 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 1, 3 11 12 13 The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (Dkt. 14 No. 6.) It must now review the complaint’s allegations under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Because 15 Plaintiff’s claims for misrepresentation under 17 U.S.C. § 512(f)(2) and intentional infliction of 16 emotional distress (“IIED”) do not…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API