Legal Opinion

Holzhauer v. Saks & Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 25, 1997No. Misc. No. 21, September Term, 1996PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASANOW, Judge.

The United States District Court for the District of Maryland has certified the following three questions to this Court pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, Maryland Code (1974,1995 Repl.Vol., 1996 Supp.), Courts & Judicial Proceedings Article, §§ 12-601 through 12-613, and Maryland Rule 8-305.

1. Do Appellant’s allegations with respect to negligence amount to a waiver of res ipsa loquitur, as in Dover Elevator Co. v. Swann, 334 Md. 231, 638 A.2d 762 (1994)?

2. If not, does the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur apply under the facts thus far…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Benedick v. PottsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  2. Smith v. BernfeldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  3. Strasburger v. VogelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  4. Meda v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Dover Elevator Co. v. SwannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Casey v. Geek Squad® Subsidiary Best Buy Stores, L.P.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  2. Rodriguez v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Giant Food, Inc. v. BookerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. District of Columbia v. SingletonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Norris v. Ross Stores, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API