Legal Opinion · Dissent

3720 Homes, Inc. v. Hyman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 30, 2010Published

1Dissent

McKeon, PJ.

(dissenting). Contrary to the view of the majority and the housing court, I do not believe that there are factual issues warranting a trial and would award summary judgment to the Hymans (tenants) since they have established by documentary evidence and affidavits that the subject premises is a pet friendly building, and that the dog which tenants are alleged to be harboring, named Rocky, actually resides with and is owned by their daughter Julie Hyman.* While landlord essentially concedes that Rocky is a visitor, it asserts that the frequency and regularity of his visits violates…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seward Park Housing Corp. v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Board of Managers v. LamontaneroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API