Horne v. George H. Hammond Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. The .case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chief Justice :
The title of this cause describes plaintiff in error as “of Chelsea in said district,” and the decedent as “ late of Chelsea,” and the defendant as “ a corporation organized. under the laws of the State of Michigan.” The writ and the original declaration do not appear in the record. The amended declaration commences thus: “ Plaintiff says that she is the widow of the late Granville P. Horne of Chelsea, Suffolk County, Comtaonwealth of Massachusetts, and that she was duly appointed by the probate court of Suffolk County administratrix of his estate.”
As the transcript of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Robertson v. CeaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Anderson v. WattSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Denny v. PironiSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Timmons v. Elyton Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
3Cited by24 opinions
- Norton v. LarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Columbia Digger Co. v. RectorDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1914
- Mexican Central Railway Co. v. DuthieSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Marks v. MarksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Tennessee · 1896
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.