Legal Opinion

Adkisson v. Gamble

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1943No. 31608PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is a suit to recover benefits under the workmen’s compensation law for an accident alleged to have been suffered by plaintiff’s husband in the course of his employment by the defendants.’ The trial court entered judgment for the defendants and plaintiff appeals.

While we are of the opinion that the evidence is 'insufficient to sustain a finding that an accident occurred within the meaning of the workmen’s compensation law, or that plaintiff’s husband was an employee and not an independent contractor, we are obliged to dispose of the appeal on other grounds.

Defendants have filed a motion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Romberg v. FokkenNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Joyce v. SprecherNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Fallis v. VogelNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Shaw v. Diers Bros. & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Field v. Nebraska Telephone Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Weasmer v. Manpower of Omaha, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Bednar v. BednarNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Ratay v. WylieNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Dryden & Jensen v. MachNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  5. State Ex Rel. Weasmer v. Manpower of Omaha, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API