Legal Opinion

Brigham v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 4, 1900No. Nos. 11,872-(33)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action in the district court for St. Louis county to set aside a mortgage foreclosure sale. The case was tried before Ensign, J., who found in favor of defendant. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

It is sought to set aside a mortgage foreclosure sale made by advertisement under G-. S. 1894, c. 81, tit. 1, upon the ground that no proper service of the foreclosure notice was made upon the occupant in possession of the mortgaged premises,- — -a lot in the city of Duluth, — under the requirements of section 6032 of the chapter referred to. This case was here before upon an appeal from a refusal of the trial court to find fully upon the facts constituting the alleged service, — in respect to its being made upon the mortgagor at the “house of his usual abode, with some person of suitable age…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brigham v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lovin v. HicksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API