Legal Opinion · Dissent

Howard v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 25, 2004No. A03A1915Published

1Dissent

Adams; Judge,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent because I do not believe that the stop was authorized by a reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal activity.

An officer may briefly stop a vehicle to investigate only if the stop is justified by specific, articulable facts sufficient to give rise to a reasonable suspicion of criminal conduct, that is, by “some objective manifestation that the person stopped is, or is about to be, engaged in criminal activity.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Postell v. State of Ga., 264 Ga. 249 (443 SE2d 628) (1994).

Martin v. State, 257 Ga. App. 435,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. State v. WinnieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Garmon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  5. Postell v. State of Ga.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API