Howard v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Dissent
Adams; Judge,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent because I do not believe that the stop was authorized by a reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal activity.
An officer may briefly stop a vehicle to investigate only if the stop is justified by specific, articulable facts sufficient to give rise to a reasonable suspicion of criminal conduct, that is, by “some objective manifestation that the person stopped is, or is about to be, engaged in criminal activity.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Postell v. State of Ga., 264 Ga. 249 (443 SE2d 628) (1994).
Martin v. State, 257 Ga. App. 435,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- State v. WinnieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Garmon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Postell v. State of Ga.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.