Legal Opinion
Nabisco Brands, Inc. v. Quaker Oats Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 20, 1982No. Civ. A. 82-2934PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAROKIN, District Judge.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Plaintiffs, Nabisco Brands Inc. and Nabisco (hereinafter “Nabisco”), instituted this action against defendant, The Quaker Oats Company (hereinafter “Quaker”), alleging trademark infringement and unfair competition. Nabisco contends that Quaker has infringed its registered trademark CREAM OF WHEAT (R) by manufacturing and marketing Quaker CREAMY WHEAT and that the manufacturing and marketing of such product constitutes unfair competition. Nabisco seeks a temporary restraining order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65.
Substantially all of the facts are…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Scott Paper Company, a Corporation v. Scott's Liquid Gold, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Pignons S. A. De Mecanique De Precision v. Polaroid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tonka Corp. v. Rose Art Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- American Greetings Corp. v. Dan-Dee Imports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Taj Mahal Enterprises, Ltd. v. TrumpDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- Transfer Print Foils, Inc. v. Transfer Print America, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Taj Mahal Enterprises, Ltd. v. TrumpDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.