Esmeralda Water Co. v. MacKley
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Badt, J.:
This appeal presents for our chief consideration the question of the ownership of tailings deposited by a mining and milling company, from its own and custom ores, or from custom ores alone, upon open and unappropriated public domain and there impounded in a tailings pond by a dam or retaining yrall, as against a subsequent placer locator of ground including the tailings pond. Lest this seem over simple in view of the well-recognized rule sustaining the title to and possession of such tailings (unless abandoned) as ag’ainst a subsequent location, we must add that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Conway v. FabianMontana Supreme Court · 1939
- In Re Waters of Manse SpringNevada Supreme Court · 1940
- Mallett v. Uncle Sam Gold & Silver Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1865
- Goldfield Consolidated Milling & Transportation Co. v. Old Sandstorm Annex Gold Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1915
- Rogers v. CooneyNevada Supreme Court · 1872
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. UsfwsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022