Legal Opinion

Esmeralda Water Co. v. MacKley

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1949No. 3569PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, J.:

This appeal presents for our chief consideration the question of the ownership of tailings deposited by a mining and milling company, from its own and custom ores, or from custom ores alone, upon open and unappropriated public domain and there impounded in a tailings pond by a dam or retaining yrall, as against a subsequent placer locator of ground including the tailings pond. Lest this seem over simple in view of the well-recognized rule sustaining the title to and possession of such tailings (unless abandoned) as ag’ainst a subsequent location, we must add that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Conway v. FabianMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  2. In Re Waters of Manse SpringNevada Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Mallett v. Uncle Sam Gold & Silver Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Goldfield Consolidated Milling & Transportation Co. v. Old Sandstorm Annex Gold Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Rogers v. CooneyNevada Supreme Court · 1872

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. UsfwsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API