Legal Opinion

United States v. Alejandro Umana

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 12, 2014No. 10-6Published

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER PUBLISHED FILED: August 12, 2014 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6 (3:08-cr-00134-RJC-2) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ALEJANDRO ENRIQUE RAMIREZ UMANA, a/k/a Wizard, a/k/a Lobo, Defendant – Appellant. O R D E R The Court denies the petition for rehearing en banc. A requested poll of the Court failed to produce a majority of judges in regular active service and not disqualified who voted in favor of rehearing en banc. Judge Motz, Judge Gregory, Judge Keenan, Judge Wynn, and Judge Thacker voted to grant rehearing en banc. Chief…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API