Legal Opinion

Clark v. Clay

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 7, 1973No. SC 233PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARWOOD, Justice.

Luther Clay and his son, Rufus Clay, filed a bill in the Circuit Court of Marion County, Alabama, in Equity, seeking to cancel a deed executed by Luther Clay on December 27, 1971, by which certain described lands were conveyed to Lillie Clark and Mazie Cox, daughters of Luther Clay, with a life estate reserved to the grantor. The basis asserted for cancelling the deed was the mental incompetence of Luther Clay at the time of the execution of the deed, and further, the undue influence exercised by Lillie Clark and Mazie Cox on Luther Clay in procuring the execution of the deed.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Bumpass v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1836
  3. Lutterworth & Lowe v. CathcartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Eslava v. FarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  5. Taylor v. State Ex Rel. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Co. v. CurrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Jones v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API