Legal Opinion

Neo4j, Inc. v. Graph Foundation, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 29, 2020No. 5:19-cv-06226Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 NEO4J, INC., 8 Case No. 5:19-cv-06226-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO 10 STRIKE GRAPH FOUNDATION, INC., 11 Re: Dkt. No. 32 Defendant. 12 13 Before the Court is Plaintiff Neo4j, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff or “Neo4j USA”) motion to strike 14 Defendant Graph Foundation, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “GFI”) Fourth Affirmative Defense for 15 Naked License Abandonment of Trademark; Fifth Affirmative Defense for “Right to Fork and Use 16 Neo4J Open Source under GitHub Terms of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Leadsinger, Inc. v. BMG Music PublishingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Sidney-Vinstein v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Galbraith v. County of Santa ClaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. TELESAURUS VPC, LLC v. PowerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API